Skip to main content

What Is the Risk of a Malleated Transaction to the Original Sender?

The primary risk of a malleated transaction to the original sender was in the context of double-spending attempts in multi-stage protocols. If the sender relied on the original TXID to confirm a subsequent action (like receiving a refund or a linked payment), the malleated TXID could cause that subsequent action to fail.

In the case of an exchange, a user could claim they never received a withdrawal because the TXID was changed, leading to a fraudulent refund. The risk was less about the underlying transfer and more about protocol failure.

How Did the SegWit Upgrade Address the Transaction Malleability Issue?
What Are the Historical Examples of Successful and Failed Rebase-Based Stablecoins?
What Is the Difference between a Single-Collateral and Multi-Collateral CDP System?
How Does a ‘Dead Coin’ Differ from a Failed Project with Strong Vesting?