Skip to main content

What Is the Risk of a Protocol Modifying Its Token Burn Mechanism?

The primary risk is that a governance vote could reverse or reduce the burn rate, instantly increasing the effective future token supply and significantly lowering the perceived intrinsic value. This governance risk is a key factor in the risk premium of the valuation model.

Investors must assess the concentration of voting power and the incentive alignment of the largest token holders. A clear, immutable, and smart-contract-enforced burn mechanism reduces this risk.

Explain the Concept of “Token Burn” and Its Effect on Fungible Token Supply and Value
Is a Buyback-and-Burn Mechanism Superior to a Direct Fee Burn from a Valuation Perspective?
How Is a Token Burn Often Used as a Mechanism for Revenue Sharing or Protocol Fee Distribution?
What Is the Difference between a Capped Supply and an Uncapped Supply Token Model?