What Is the Risk of an ICO Team Using Pseudonyms or Remaining Anonymous?

The primary risk is the lack of accountability and difficulty in performing due diligence on the team's professional background and experience. An anonymous team can easily abandon the project without facing legal or reputational consequences, leading to a potential scam or project failure.

This anonymity significantly increases the risk of a "rug pull" or fraud. While some privacy-focused projects may justify it, investors should be highly skeptical of fully anonymous teams, especially in complex financial projects.

It prevents investors from verifying expertise and past performance.

Why Is It Important for Team Members to Have a Complete and Verifiable LinkedIn Profile?
How Can Investors Verify the Legitimacy of a Project’s Technical Advisors?
What Are the Due Diligence Steps to Take When a Project Has Partially Anonymous Members?
Can a Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) Operate with a Fully Anonymous Core Team?
What Is the Difference between “Crime Insurance” and “Professional Liability Insurance” for a Custodian?
In Which Specific Cryptocurrency Sectors Is Anonymity More Common or Accepted?
How Does Regulatory Scrutiny Change for Projects with Anonymous Teams?
How Does a Third-Party KYC Process Add Credibility to an ICO Team?

Glossar