What Is the Risk of Fractional Reserve Stablecoins versus Purely Algorithmic Ones?

Fractional reserve stablecoins hold less than $1 in reserves for every stablecoin issued, relying on user confidence and liquidity. Their risk is a traditional bank run, where mass redemptions exceed the reserves, forcing a de-peg.

Purely algorithmic stablecoins, with zero reserve, face a higher risk of a death spiral because their stabilization mechanism relies on a volatile token that can collapse under pressure, making them inherently more fragile.

How Do Over-Collateralized Stablecoins like MakerDAO’s DAI Attempt to Mitigate Psychological “Bank Run” Risks?
What Are the Similarities and Differences between a Stablecoin Run and a Traditional Bank Run?
How Does a CBDC Differ from Commercial Bank Money?
What Is the Definition of a ‘Run on the Bank’ in the Context of Stablecoins?
How Does the Concept of “Death Spirals” Apply to Algorithmic Stablecoins?
What Is a “Gamma Squeeze” and Is It Relevant in a Death Spiral?
How Do Uninsured Bank Deposits in Reserves Create a Potential Run Risk?
What Are the Risks of a Stablecoin Operating on a ‘Fractional Reserve’ Basis?

Glossar