What Is the Risk of Using a Stablecoin without a PoR Oracle?

A stablecoin without a Proof-of-Reserve (PoR) oracle carries the risk of being unbacked or fractional. The issuer's claim that the token is backed 1:1 by a reserve asset (like USD) must be taken on faith, creating counterparty risk.

If the reserve is insufficient, the stablecoin could 'de-peg' and lose its value, leading to a loss of user funds and systemic instability across DeFi protocols that rely on it as collateral.

What Is “De-Pegging” in the Context of Stablecoins and How Does It Affect LPs?
How Does a Stablecoin’s Regulatory Compliance Affect Its Perceived Transparency?
How Does a Sudden Loss of Confidence Trigger a De-Pegging Event?
What Is the Main Challenge in Formally Verifying a Contract with External Calls?
What Is the Difference between an ‘Algorithmic’ and a ‘Fiat-Backed’ Stablecoin?
What Are the Consequences for a Fiat-Backed Stablecoin Issuer If They Fail to Maintain Adequate Reserves?
What Is the Risk of Relying Solely on Historical Data for Stress Testing Crypto Markets?
How Can an Independent Audit Mitigate the Risk of Centralized Stablecoin Reserves?

Glossar