Skip to main content

What Is the Risk Profile of an Algorithmic Stablecoin versus a Fiat-Backed Stablecoin?

Fiat-backed stablecoins (like USDC) are generally lower risk, as each token is theoretically redeemable for a corresponding fiat currency held in reserve, making their peg relatively stable. Algorithmic stablecoins rely on smart contract mechanisms and incentives to maintain their peg, which introduces significant model risk and potential for a 'death spiral' if the algorithm fails to manage volatility, making them higher risk.

How Does the Counterparty Risk Differ between Holding an Algorithmic versus an Asset-Backed Stablecoin?
What Specific Market Conditions Can Trigger a Death Spiral in an Algorithmic Stablecoin?
What Is the Difference between a ‘Fiat-Backed’ and a ‘Crypto-Backed’ Stablecoin?
What Are Some Historical Examples of Rebase Tokens That Have Experienced a Death Spiral?