What Is the Significance of the “Solely from the Efforts of Others” Prong in Modern Crypto Cases?

The "solely from the efforts of others" prong is significant because it determines if investors are passive participants relying on the promoters for profit, a key characteristic of a security. In modern crypto cases, courts often interpret "solely" as "predominantly" or "substantially" to reflect the economic reality of the transaction.

If a token's value appreciation is driven by the network's development team, it is more likely to meet this prong. Conversely, if profits depend on the efforts of the token holders themselves, the token may not be classified as a security.

Are There Legal Precedents for Institutional Crypto Asset Loss Cases?
How Is the ‘Common Enterprise’ Prong Interpreted for Decentralized Crypto Projects?
How Does Vesting of Team Tokens Protect Early ICO Investors?
Is Staking Considered a Passive or Active Investment Strategy?
How Might a Crypto Market in Strong Backwardation Be Interpreted by Traders?
What Is the Difference between an ‘Active’ and ‘Passive’ Order in the Context of Market Making?
What Legal Precedents Have Further Defined “Common Enterprise” in Crypto Cases?
Why Is an Anonymous Development Team a Major Red Flag for Investors?

Glossar