Skip to main content

What Is the Trade-off between Capital Efficiency and Impermanent Loss Risk in Concentrated Liquidity?

Concentrated liquidity significantly increases capital efficiency because the LP's capital is actively used for trades within the narrow, most common price range. This earns higher fees on less capital.

The trade-off is amplified impermanent loss risk. If the price moves outside the range, the LP stops earning fees and is left with 100% of the less valuable asset, realizing a much greater loss than if they had provided liquidity across the full range.

Higher efficiency means higher potential returns but also higher risk.

How Do Concentrated Liquidity Pools Fundamentally Change the Slippage Calculation for a Specific Price Range?
What Is a Concentrated Liquidity Model and How Does It Differ from a Standard AMM?
What Is the Main Risk for a Liquidity Provider Whose Position Is Entirely “Out of Range” in a Concentrated Pool?
How Do Concentrated Liquidity Positions in AMMs like Uniswap V3 Alter the Risk Profile of Impermanent Loss?