What Is the Typical Fill Rate Benchmark for Competitive Crypto Options Market Makers?

There is no single universal benchmark, as fill rates vary significantly based on the option's liquidity, volatility, and the specific RFQ platform's structure. However, a highly competitive market maker often aims for a consistent, moderate fill rate (e.g.

15-30%) that balances volume capture with prudent risk management. Extremely high rates can signal aggressive, potentially unprofitable pricing.

How Do “Utility Tokens” Aim to Avoid Being Classified as Securities?
How Does the Introduction of a New Crypto Derivative Product Impact the Initial Fill Rate Expectations?
Why Might a Market Maker Intentionally Target a Lower Fill Rate in a Highly Volatile Crypto Options Market?
Can Velocity Be Modeled as a Function of the Network’s Fee Structure?
Does a High Fill Rate Always Guarantee Maximum Profitability for a Market Maker?
What Is the Difference between ‘All-or-None’ and ‘Partial Fill’ in an RFQ System?
How Does the ‘Moneyness’ of an Option Contract Affect the Expected Fill Rate for a Market Maker?
Why Might a Stop-Limit Order Fail to Execute Completely?

Glossar