What Layer 2 Solution Eliminates the Need for a Long Withdrawal Period? ⎊ Path

What Layer 2 Solution Eliminates the Need for a Long Withdrawal Period?

ZK-Rollups eliminate the need for a long withdrawal period. Since ZK-Rollups cryptographically prove the validity of every state transition before posting it to Layer 1, there is no need for a fraud-proof challenge window.

Once the validity proof is verified by the Layer 1 smart contract, the funds can be immediately withdrawn, leading to near-instant finality and a superior user experience for moving assets between layers.

What Is the Difference between an “Optimistic Rollup” and a “ZK-Rollup”?

What Is the Fundamental Difference between Optimistic Rollups and ZK-Rollups?

What Are the Security Trade-Offs between Optimistic Rollups and ZK-Rollups for Financial Applications?

What Is the Primary Difference between Optimistic Rollups and ZK-Rollups?

What Is the Difference between a ZK-Rollup and an Optimistic Rollup?

How Does a “Validity Proof” Differ from a “Fraud Proof” in the Context of Blockchain Finality?

What Are ‘Rollups’ (Optimistic and ZK) and How Do They Use Batching?

What Is the Trade-off between Using a Short TWAP Window versus a Long TWAP Window?