What Mechanisms Can a Protocol Implement to Intentionally Reduce a Token’s Velocity?

Protocols can implement several mechanisms to reduce velocity. The most common is mandatory staking or lock-up for governance rights or to earn yield.

Requiring the token as collateral in DeFi applications also reduces its circulation. Additionally, implementing a time-based vesting schedule for team and early investor tokens limits the immediate supply entering the market.

Finally, a well-designed fee-burning mechanism can reduce the effective circulating supply, which acts similarly to reduced velocity.

How Do Vesting Schedules for Team Tokens Compare to Those for Early Investors?
How Does the Concept of “Liquidity Mining” Influence the Observed Token Velocity?
How Do Stablecoins Generally Exhibit a High Velocity Compared to Governance Tokens?
How Do Lock-up Agreements Relate to Token Vesting Schedules?
How Do Investor Lock-Ups Differ from Team Lock-Ups?
How Does the Duration of a Lock-up Period in Staking Affect Its Perceived Value?
How Do Vesting Schedules Affect the Circulating Supply and Short-Term Price?
How Can a Protocol Design Reduce Its Token Velocity?