What Regulatory Differences Exist between Dark Pools and OTC Trading in Traditional Finance, and How Does This Apply to Crypto?

In traditional finance, dark pools are generally regulated as Alternative Trading Systems (ATS) and have specific transparency requirements. OTC trading, while also regulated, is often less transparent, relying on reporting requirements after execution.

In the crypto space, regulatory frameworks are less mature and vary globally. Crypto dark pools and OTC desks often operate under less stringent, or evolving, regulations, though institutional venues increasingly seek compliance.

Does ‘Payment for Order Flow’ (PFOF) Apply to Crypto Dark Pools?
How Does a Lack of Regulation Affect the Integrity of Trade Reporting in OTC Crypto?
What Is Regulation ATS and How Does It Apply to Trading Venues?
Are There Any Reporting Requirements for Trades Executed on Crypto Dark Pools?
What Specific Regulations Govern Traditional Dark Pools That Crypto OTC Desks Typically Avoid?
How Do Regulatory Bodies Attempt to Monitor and Control Non-Public Trading Activity?
Are Crypto OTC Desks Subject to the Same Regulatory Oversight as Traditional Dark Pools?
What Is the Regulatory Body Responsible for Overseeing Dark Pools in the US?

Glossar