What Was the ‘Kimchi Premium’ and How Was It an Example of Regulatory Arbitrage?

The 'Kimchi Premium' was a well-known phenomenon where the price of Bitcoin in South Korea was consistently higher than on global exchanges, sometimes by as much as 30-50%. This price gap was a direct result of South Korea's strict capital controls and financial regulations, which made it very difficult for residents to move large amounts of Korean Won out of the country to buy cheaper Bitcoin elsewhere.

This created a persistent arbitrage opportunity that was difficult to close due to the regulatory friction, making it a prime example of regulatory-driven market inefficiency.

How Does the Legal Framework of a Country Affect Bankruptcy Proceedings for Crypto Exchanges?
How Do Regulations in Asia for Stablecoins Compare to Those in the US and EU?
How Do Capital Controls in a Country Affect the Ability of Traders to Perform Cryptocurrency Arbitrage?
How Does a Sudden, Large Price Gap Affect an Account’s Equity Relative to Its Maintenance Margin?
How Does ‘Liquidity’ Impact the Success of a Pump-and-Dump Scheme?
How Do KYC and AML Regulations for Crypto Vary across Different Jurisdictions?
What Does Persistent Backwardation in a Crypto Asset like Ether Suggest about Its Immediate Supply?
Why Is Persistent Backwardation Less Common in Non-Perishable Commodity Futures?

Glossar