Skip to main content

Which Rollup Type Is Currently Better Suited for Smaller, High-Frequency Transactions?

ZK-Rollups are generally better suited for smaller, high-frequency transactions, especially at scale. While the initial cost of generating the zero-knowledge proof is high, this cost is amortized across a large batch of transactions.

The Layer 1 verification cost per transaction becomes very low. Optimistic Rollups, while having low submission costs, still face the capital lock-up and delay issues which can be problematic for high-frequency strategies.

How Does the Overhead of Proof Generation Impact Transaction Fees?
What Is the Primary Difference between Optimistic Rollups and ZK-Rollups?
What Is the Difference between a ZK-Rollup and an Optimistic Rollup?
What Specific Blockchain Architectures (E.g. Layer 2 Solutions) Are Best Suited to Handle the High Throughput Required for Derivatives Trading?