Skip to main content

Which Type of Futures Contract Is More Prone to Socialized Losses?

Futures contracts that use coin-margined (inverse) collateral are historically more prone to socialized losses. In these contracts, the value of the collateral itself (e.g.

BTC) can fluctuate wildly, potentially exacerbating the deficit during a market crash. USDT-margined (linear) contracts, where collateral is a stablecoin, are generally less prone because the collateral's value is stable, simplifying risk management and deficit calculation.

How Does ADL Differ from ‘Socialized Losses’ in Futures Trading?
What Is the Settlement Currency Typically Used in Crypto Futures?
Why Are Socialized Losses Considered More Detrimental to Market Sentiment than ADL?
If a BTC Call Has a 30k Strike and BTC Is 35k, What Is the Intrinsic Value?