Who Is Legally Liable If a Smart Contract Autonomously Executes a Transaction Based on Faulty Data from an Oracle?

Determining liability is a complex and largely untested legal area. Liability could potentially fall on several parties.

The oracle provider could be held liable if their service-level agreement guaranteed data accuracy. The developers of the smart contract could be liable if they were negligent in its design or failed to account for potential data errors.

In some cases, the users who opted into the smart contract might be deemed to have accepted the risks, under the principle of "caveat emptor" (buyer beware). The legal outcome would likely depend on the specific facts, jurisdiction, and any contractual agreements between the parties.

How Does a DAO Differ from a Traditional ‘Limited Liability Company’ (LLC)?
Can a CEX Be Held Liable for a Front-Running Incident If It Was Unaware of the Employee’s Actions?
What Is the Legal Status of a DAO and How Does It Differ from a Registered Company?
What Is the Potential Legal Challenge for a DAO?
What Legal and Regulatory Challenges Do DAOs Face That Traditional Corporations Do Not?
How Can a Faulty Oracle Affect the Calculation of Collateralization Ratio?
What Are the Key Regulatory Challenges for DAOs Operating in the Financial Derivatives Space?
Could a Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) Governing a Stablecoin Be Held Legally Liable for AML/KYC Failures?

Glossar