Why Are Decentralized Exchange (DEX) Options Often More Susceptible to Slippage than Centralized Exchange (CEX) Options?

DEX options typically use Automated Market Makers (AMMs) or have lower liquidity and fragmented order books compared to centralized exchanges. AMM models, while capital efficient, often result in higher slippage for large trades due to the nature of their pricing curves.

Furthermore, transaction finality on a blockchain can introduce latency, increasing the chance of unfavorable price changes before the trade is confirmed.

How Does the Choice of Exchange (CEX Vs. DEX) Impact the Transaction Cost Component?
How Does a Cryptocurrency Exchange’s Order Book Depth Directly Influence Potential Slippage?
How Does an Automated Market Maker (AMM) Model Mitigate or Exacerbate Slippage Compared to an Order Book?
Why Are Cryptocurrency Indices Often Considered More Susceptible to Manipulation than Traditional Indices?
How Does a Decentralized Exchange (DEX) Handle Slippage Compared to a Centralized Exchange (CEX)?
Does the Volatility Surface for an Altcoin Typically Have a Higher or Lower IV than Bitcoin?
How Does a ‘Liquidity Pool’ in DeFi Differ from a Centralized Exchange Order Book?
How Do Different DEX Architectures (E.g. AMM Vs. Order Book) Affect Front-Running Vulnerability?

Glossar