Why Are Fully Algorithmic Stablecoins Generally Considered High-Risk?

They are high-risk because their stability relies solely on complex algorithms, market incentives, and the value of a secondary, often volatile, governance token, rather than tangible, high-quality collateral. This makes them highly vulnerable to bank runs, where panic selling can overwhelm the stabilization mechanism, leading to a rapid and often irreversible "death spiral."

How Does the Collateralization Ratio Differ between Algorithmic and Fully Backed Stablecoins?
How Does an Algorithmic Stablecoin’s Design Differ from a Collateralized One in a Death Spiral?
How Does Imperman-Ent Loss in Liquidity Pools Affect the Secondary Token’s Stability?
What Is the Role of Deposit Insurance in Traditional Banking and Why Is It Absent for Stablecoins?
Can a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) Be Designed to Be Immune to the Psychological Factors That Affect Algorithmic Stablecoins?
How Does the Concept of “Death Spirals” Apply to Algorithmic Stablecoins?
How Does an Algorithmic Stablecoin’s Risk Profile Differ from a Fiat-Backed Stablecoin during a Stress Event?
How Do Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) Differ from Stablecoins?

Glossar