Why Do Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs) Often Use Automated Market Makers (AMMs) Instead of Traditional Order Books?

AMMs are favored by DEXs because they eliminate the need for traditional market makers and the centralized infrastructure of an order book. They use liquidity pools and mathematical formulas (like x y=k) to determine asset prices and execute trades.

This model is inherently resistant to the "shallow book" problem of traditional order books in low-volume assets, ensuring continuous liquidity. However, this mechanism introduces a different form of cost known as 'impermanent loss' and often higher price impact (slippage) for large trades.

How Does a Cryptocurrency Exchange’s Order Book Depth Directly Influence Potential Slippage?
How Do ‘Concentrated Liquidity’ AMMs Attempt to Improve Capital Efficiency and Reduce Slippage?
How Do Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs) Handle Bid-Offer Spreads Differently than Centralized Exchanges (CEXs)?
What Are the Primary Mechanisms through Which Automated Market Makers (AMMs) Facilitate Token Swaps?
How Do Automated Market Makers (AMMs) Differ from Traditional Order Book Exchanges in a Smart Contract Context?
What Is the Primary Difference in How Slippage Is Calculated on an AMM versus a CLOB?
How Can Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs) Impact Altcoin Liquidity Compared to Centralized Exchanges (CEXs)?
How Do Automated Market Makers (AMMs) Handle Large-Scale Liquidations Compared to Traditional Order Books?

Glossar