Why Do Market Makers Primarily Use Limit Orders Rather than Market Orders?

Market makers profit from the bid-ask spread by simultaneously placing limit buy (bid) and limit sell (ask) orders. By using limit orders, they provide liquidity and are often eligible for 'maker' rebates, which reduces their trading costs.

Crucially, limit orders ensure they control the price at which they execute, protecting them from the immediate negative slippage and price impact that a market order would incur, which is vital for their low-margin business model.

Does Slippage Only Occur on Market Orders, or Can It Affect Limit Orders as Well?
How Do ‘Limit Orders’ Mitigate Slippage Risk Compared to ‘Market Orders’?
What Are ‘Limit Orders’ and ‘Market Orders,’ and Which Type of Order Pays the Cost of Immediacy?
How Do CEXs Incentivize Market Makers to Maintain Tight Spreads?
How Does the ‘Limit Order’ versus ‘Market Order’ Choice Relate to Market Impact?
What Is ‘Negative Slippage’ and How Does It Differ from ‘Positive Slippage’?
What Incentives Do Exchanges Offer to Market Makers to Ensure Narrow Spreads?
How Do Limit Orders Attempt to Control Slippage on Public Exchanges?

Glossar