Why Do Older Contracts Still Need to Be Audited for Integer Vulnerabilities?

Older smart contracts written before Solidity version 0.8.0, or those that explicitly use unchecked blocks, still need to be rigorously audited for integer vulnerabilities. These contracts do not benefit from the compiler's automatic safety checks.

Auditors must specifically look for the correct and consistent use of SafeMath or manually verify that every arithmetic operation cannot lead to an overflow or underflow, as these flaws can still be exploited to manipulate balances and drain funds.

What Are the Most Common Security Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts despite Blockchain Security?
Can Formal Verification Prove the Absence of All Security Vulnerabilities?
How Does the Compiler Handle Assembly Code regarding Integer Checks?
How Are Smart Contracts Audited to Identify and Mitigate Security Risks?
What Are the Key Differences in the Skillsets of a Smart Contract Auditor and a Traditional Software Auditor?
How Do Index Providers Audit or Verify the Trading Volumes Reported by Exchanges?
What Are the Legal and Operational Requirements for Auditing the Reserves of an Asset-Backed Stablecoin?
What Tools Are Used to Detect Integer Overflow and Underflow Vulnerabilities?