Why Is a 51% Attack More Difficult on Bitcoin than on Smaller PoW Chains?

A 51% attack on Bitcoin is prohibitively expensive because of the immense, decentralized scale of its network hashrate. Acquiring and maintaining the necessary specialized mining hardware (ASICs) and the associated electricity cost to consistently control over 50% of the global hashrate is economically infeasible for most entities.

Smaller PoW chains have much lower barriers to entry.

How Does a ‘Sybil Attack’ Relate to the Need for a Costly Mechanism like PoW?
Why Are Larger Networks like Bitcoin Considered Highly Resistant to 51% Attacks?
Which Type of Cryptocurrency Chains Are Most Vulnerable to a 51% Attack?
Explain the Concept of ‘Economic Finality’ in Blockchain Consensus
What Is the Primary Defense Mechanism against a 51% Attack?
Why Is Acquiring 51% of Staked Tokens Generally Harder than Renting 51% of Hashrate?
How Does the Cost of Electricity Act as a Natural Economic Deterrent against Sustaining a 51% Attack?
How Does the Cost of a 51% Attack Differ between PoW and PoS?

Glossar