Why Is a Low-Liquidity Asset More Vulnerable to a Settlement Window Attack?

A low-liquidity asset is more vulnerable because an attacker requires less capital to significantly move its price. In a thin market, a relatively small buy or sell order can create a large price change.

If this happens during the settlement window, the final average price can be easily skewed, allowing the attacker to profit from their derivative position with minimal investment compared to a high-liquidity asset.

Can a Slow-Moving or Low-Volume Asset Still Be Vulnerable to a TWAP Oracle Attack?
What Is the Trade-off between Using a Short TWAP Window versus a Long TWAP Window?
How Does Lengthening the Settlement Window Mitigate the Risk of an Attack?
What Are the Security Risks Associated with a TWAP Implementation That Uses a Small Time Window?
How Does the Final Settlement Price for Cash-Settled Futures Typically Get Determined?
What Is the Risk of Using a TWAP Window That Spans a Major Market Holiday?
How Does the Chosen Time Window Affect the Effectiveness of a TWAP Oracle?
How Is Volume-Weighted Average Price (VWAP) Applied to Determine the Liquidation Price of a Futures Contract?

Glossar