Why Is ADL Generally Preferred over Socialized Loss by Major Exchanges?

ADL is preferred because it is a more targeted and precise mechanism. It only affects the most profitable and highly-leveraged traders, who are typically better equipped to handle the reduction in position size.

Socialized loss, by contrast, affects all profitable traders, regardless of their leverage or magnitude of profit, leading to broader market dissatisfaction. ADL also allows for quicker deficit resolution.

Can an Exchange Switch between ADL and Socialized Loss Systems?
What Is the Role of the ‘Risk Limit’ in Preventing Large ADL Events?
How Does ADL Affect the Profit of Other Traders?
What Is “Auto-Deleveraging” (ADL) and How Does It Compare to Socialized Loss?
How Do Decentralized Exchanges Attempt to Avoid Both ADL and Socialized Loss?
How Does ADL Differ from a Socialized Loss System?
What Criteria Are Used to Rank Traders for the ADL Process?
How Does an Exchange Determine Which Profitable Traders Are Subject to ADL?

Glossar