Why Is Double-Spending Easier on a Blockchain with Low Hash Rate?

Double-spending is easier on a blockchain with a low hash rate because the cost and effort required to perform a 51% attack are significantly reduced. A low hash rate means an attacker needs less computing power to gain a majority (51%) control of the network's total mining power.

With 51% control, the attacker can create a longer, private chain containing the double-spend, then release it to the network, causing a re-org that invalidates the original, legitimate transaction.

How Does Transaction Finality Relate to the Vulnerability of a Double-Spend Attack?
How Does a Low Hash Rate Make a Cryptocurrency More Susceptible to a 51% Attack?
Why Is a 51% Attack More Economically Feasible on Smaller, Less Popular Cryptocurrencies?
What Is the Primary Difference in Security Model between PoW and Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS)?
What Is the Difference between a Soft Fork and a Malicious Re-Org?
What Role Do Full Nodes Play in Validating and Preventing the Acceptance of a Malicious Re-Org?
How Does a “Hash Rate” Differ from “Network Difficulty”?
What Is the Difference between a 51 Percent Attack and a Double-Spending Attempt?

Glossar