Skip to main content

Why Is ‘Perfect’ Delta-Neutral Hedging Impossible in Practice?

Perfect delta-neutral hedging is impossible because delta is constantly changing (Gamma risk), requiring continuous re-hedging, which is impractical due to transaction costs and discrete trading intervals. Furthermore, options models like Black-Scholes rely on assumptions (e.g. continuous trading, constant volatility) that are not met in the real world.

Finally, the discrete nature of the underlying asset's price movements prevents a truly continuous hedge.

What Were the Main Assumptions Made by Fischer Black and Myron Scholes in Their Model?
How Are Vega and Gamma Used Together in a Portfolio’s Risk Analysis?
Why Is the Assumption of No Transaction Costs a Significant Limitation of the Model in Real-World Trading?
In Derivatives, How Does a “Basis Risk” Parallel the Challenge of the Nothing-at-Stake Problem?