Why Is the Strong Form of the Efficient Market Hypothesis Largely Considered to Be False?

The strong form of the EMH is considered false because of the documented existence of insider trading profits. This form of the hypothesis claims that even private, non-public information is already reflected in stock prices.

However, numerous legal cases and market data show that individuals with access to inside information can and do achieve abnormal returns by trading on it before it becomes public. The very existence of laws against insider trading is a testament to the fact that such information can be highly profitable, which contradicts the strong-form EMH.

Is Latency Arbitrage Considered Illegal Market Manipulation by US Regulators?
How Does Wash Trading Specifically Violate the Assumptions of the Efficient Market Hypothesis?
What Is the ‘Efficient Market Hypothesis’ and What Are Its Three Forms?
Which Form of EMH Is Most Applicable to the Current State of the Cryptocurrency Market?
What Is the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) and Its Three Forms?
How Does the Lack of Centralized Regulation Affect the EMH in the Crypto Space?
What Is a ‘Wash Trade’ and Why Is It Illegal in Traditional Markets?
How Would Technical Analysis Be Viewed under the Weak Form of the Efficient Market Hypothesis?

Glossar