Why Would a Non-Deterministic Hash Function Be Disastrous for a Blockchain?

A non-deterministic hash function would be disastrous because it would break the core consensus mechanism of the blockchain. If the same input data (e.g. a block of transactions) produced different hash outputs for different nodes, nodes would never agree on the correct Merkle Root or block hash.

This would lead to constant chain splits, preventing the network from reaching consensus and making it impossible to verify the integrity of the ledger. Determinism is non-negotiable for a public, distributed ledger.

What Are the Limitations of ‘Code Is Law’ When Dealing with Unforeseen Events?
What Is the Role of a Consensus Mechanism in a Private Blockchain?
How Do Tokenized Assets Rely on the Chronological Integrity of the Block Chain?
What Is a “Fork” in a Blockchain and How Does the Merkle Root Relate to It?
How Does the Concept of ‘Chain Splits’ Relate to Cryptocurrency Derivative Markets?
What Is a “Byzantine Fault Tolerance” (BFT) Consensus Mechanism?
Define ‘Byzantine Fault Tolerance’ (BFT)
What Are ‘Consensus Rules’ in a Blockchain Network?

Glossar